Home - 1st Corinthians - Romans - Reformed Theology - Judges - Assurance - Prayer - Moses - Stewardship - Missions - Daniel - Galatians Gospels - Worship - Acts |
MESSAGE FOR JULY 17, 2011 FROM ACTS 19:1-10
CLICK HERE FOR WMA - Audio file of the sermon
Read Acts 19:1-10
This week,
we return to Acts as we meet Paul on his third missionary journey in chapter 19. Paul
is on to Ephesus in the province of what was then called Asia. Ephesus was the leading city in Asia and the most prosperous center of commerce in the
Roman Empire.
Roughly stated,
Ephesus was to Asia what Chicago is to Illinois. If
you want to penetrate Asia with the gospel, Ephesus is your base of operations. In
chapter 19, we see Luke’s continuing record of the gospel spreading to places it had never been preached. I want
us to look at two truths from the text we heard read a few minutes ago.
The
first truth is in verses one through six. Luke
records, “1
And it happened
that while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul passed through the inland country and came to Ephesus. There he found some
disciples. 2
And he said
to them, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” And they said, “No, we have not even heard that there
is a Holy Spirit.” 3
And he said,
“Into what then were you baptized?” They said, “Into John’s baptism.” 4 And Paul said, “John baptized with the baptism of repentance, telling the people to believe
in the one who was to come after him, that is, Jesus.” 5 On hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 6 And when Paul had laid his hands on
them, the Holy Spirit came on them, and they began speaking in tongues and prophesying.” That
is one of the more theologically complicated, compressed and debated passages in Acts, but there are some crucial
truths here for us if we are to more understand, appreciate and share the gospel. That’s
our goal this morning.
The
first truth is: God’s saving work through the gospel is manifold in nature. By “manifold” I mean, multi-facetted—there
are many pieces to it. In
these six verses Luke references at least five elements of the gospel--faith, discipleship, repentance, Spirit-baptism
and water baptism. In
addition to the challenge of the theology here, the meaning of this text is very much debated. The debate centers around the question:
“Were
these men Paul first meets in Ephesus believers or unbelievers when he met them?” We
run into this question as we think about the first element of the gospel, faith
as Luke recounts this event. In
verse two he asks them, “Did
you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” Many understand that sentence to imply
that these men were believers in Christ. They
also point to verse one where Luke calls these men “disciples.” People
who understand the text this way, believe that God simply “finishes” these men here. That
is—they were believers, but were incomplete because they had simply not received the Holy Spirit. After all (so the argument goes) this
was a transitional time in redemptive history and there were other people who also did not receive the Spirit when
they believed.
In chapter eight
in Samaria, Philip preached the gospel and many Samaritans believed. They
were even baptized, but it wasn’t till Peter and John came and laid hands on them that the Spirit came upon them.
Others
hold these men were not
believers and cite verse four. “4And Paul said, “John baptized with the baptism of repentance, telling the people to believe
in the one who was to come after him, that is, Jesus.” 5 On
hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.” Here’s
the argument on this side. These
men had only been baptized into John’s baptism which was a preparatory baptism of repentance, not of salvation
with the Spirit.
Also, Paul explains
that John’s mission was not about himself or his baptism, but to compel people “to believe in the one who was to come after him,” It wasn’t until these men heard that gospel call to believe they were baptized as believers
in Jesus’ name.
Also and more
fundamentally, these men had not yet received the Holy Spirit when Paul meets them. Therefore,
they were not believers.
The
way to sort out the question of whether these men are believers is to remember a very basic, but often overlooked
rule in interpreting the Bible. That
rule is—don’t allow a Biblical narrative or story (like this one in Acts) to have the final say in understanding
Bible doctrines.
There is certainly
doctrine implicit in many narrative texts here and in the Old Testament, but we must remember that Luke’s
primary intention in writing Acts is not to teach doctrine, it’s to provide a historical account of the spread of the gospel. When you get your
doctrine from a book that isn’t intended to teach doctrine, you are opening yourself up for possible misunderstanding.
Let’s
illustrate from this passage. Some
read this passage and understand from it that these men are believers who, when Paul lays his hands on them, receive
the Spirit as a second and separate experience from conversion—a second blessing. They
have the same understanding of the Pentecost texts in Acts chapter two and believe that the follower of Jesus must
have two separate experiences—first, trusting in Jesus which saves them and second, the baptism or filling of the
Holy Spirit that empowers them for ministry. They
see that as God’s two-step pattern that is still the norm today. The
problem with that understanding is it contradicts Paul’s treatment of the Holy Spirit in First Corinthians chapter
12 which IS intended to be a doctrinal teaching. There
Paul clearly teaches in verse 13, “13For
in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body— Jews or Greeks, slaves or free—and all were
made to drink of one Spirit.”
There are not
two classes of believers—one that has trusted in Christ and a second that has trusted in Christ AND been filled
or baptized with the Holy Spirit. Paul
clearly teaches here that ALL those trusting in Christ have been baptized by the Holy Spirit. When you read Paul’s doctrinal section
on the Holy Spirit in First Corinthians, it gives us a doctrinal lens through which to read and understand the
stories in Acts.
We should NOT
read a doctrinal teaching through the lens of Biblical narrative.
Ultimately,
we must go to a text that teaches the doctrine defining the relationship between the believer and the Holy Spirit. We must go to Romans 8:9. There, in an explicitly doctrinal
teaching Paul says, “9
You,
however, are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if in fact the Spirit of God dwells in you. Anyone
who does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to him.”
That’s pretty clear, isn’t it? Paul
draws a hard line here—if you don’t have the Spirit, you don’t belong to Christ—are not saved. That forces us to conclude that these
men in Ephesus were NOT believers until after
the Spirit of God came upon them. They
came to Paul as “believers,” but only in this sense: they
may have believed in Jesus mentally, or believed what John the Baptist said about the
Messiah coming soon, but they were not born-again believers. They
were disciples, but disciples of John the Baptist who, like Jesus also had disciples.
But
what about the Samaritans in chapter eight who had two separate experiences—first, belief and water baptism and
later, the outpouring of the Holy Spirit? In
that case, there was a very important
and unique
element in
play which not only ALLOWED for the separation of these two experiences, it REQUIRED it. That
is--this was the first time the gospel had been accepted by people outside of Judea. Unlike
all who had believed the gospel up to that point, these were not purebred Jews, but Samaritans. This is a new chapter in salvation
history and as we see in the gospels, many Jews—even
Jewish followers of Christ could not believe that Samaritans could be saved. So,
authoritative witnesses were mandatory to confirm these Samaritans receiving the Spirit. If
the apostles had led the Samaritans to faith, there would have been no need for two experiences, but you’ll recall
that it was Philip the evangelist, not the apostles who led these Samaritans to faith. God
wanted the Jews to see that there is continuity between what he had done through the apostles for the Jews and
what he had done for the Samaritans. That
meant that, as in the case of the Jews, the Holy Spirit must be given in the presence of the apostles because the
apostles weren’t there when they believed and were baptized. Both
texts say something important about faith and that is--the Spirit is only given to those who have faith in Christ.
In
addition to the faith element of salvation, another element of God’s saving work in the gospel is repentance. Repentance is referenced to both
explicitly and implicitly in this passage. First,
in verse four when Paul explains that “John baptized with the baptism of repentance.” The fact that God intended John’s
baptism of repentance to prepare people for Jesus’ baptism of the Spirit implies that repentance is crucial to
salvation.
At Pentecost,
when the Jews ask Peter, “What
must we do to be saved?”
he says, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the bane of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your
sins, and you will receive the gift of the Spirit.” Receiving
the Spirit is contingent on repentance. Repentance
as an element of the gospel is also implied in two other places here. First,
in verse nine Luke records, “But
when some became stubborn and continued in unbelief, speaking evil of the Way before the congregation he withdrew
from them and took the disciples with him…” As
we see in several places in Acts, Christianity was then known as “the Way.” Whatever
else that label signifies, it means that following Christ is not about making a decision or praying a prayer or intellectually
acknowledging the truth about Jesus. Following
Christ was and is the way. It’s
the only way to God, but it’s also—the way of life that communicates that you are a believer and Christianity as a way of life implies that
you have repented of your old way of life.
A
final way in which repentance is implied is in verse eight where it says of Paul, “8 And he entered the synagogue and for three months spoke boldly, reasoning and persuading
them about the kingdom of God.” Paul is using the same language as
Jesus to describe what it is to follow Christ. It
is to be brought into a kingdom. Jesus
preached a gospel of the kingdom and in Matthew 4:17 he says, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” To
become a follower of Christ means leaving one kingdom—the kingdom of this world where sin, Satan and self-rule
are the norm and entering God’s kingdom. Matthew
6:33 says, “Seek
first the kingdom of God and his righteousness and all these things will be added to you.” Tom Schreiner says, “…this
means that human beings are to give the whole of their lives over to God because the kingdom belongs to God.
He
is the great treasure that is received when the kingdom is found…He is the sum and substance of human life and
must take priority in everything.”[1] That
implies a repentance of self-rule where you are on the throne of your life and a recognition that you are under
new management--Christ the King now rules your life.
Two
more elements of the gospel Luke highlights are: Holy
Spirit
and water baptism. When
Paul meets these men from Ephesus he asks them two questions. First,
“Did you receive
the Holy Spirit when you believed?” When
they said no, he followed up with the question, “Into what then were you baptized?” The
fact that Paul asks one question about the baptism of the Spirit followed closely by a question about water baptism
tells us there is a tight connection between being baptized by the Spirit and water baptism. When Paul hears that
they had not been baptized with the Spirit, that doesn’t make sense to him, so he digs deeper and asks about their
water baptism.
The relationship
between these two baptisms is important. Being
baptized with the Holy Spirit means several things. First,
the fact that God describes it as a baptism tells us that the idea of washing is involved. When
you are baptized with the Spirit, he applies the cleansing blood of Christ to you and you are washed clean from
your sin.
Jesus bled and
died for the believer, but it’s the Spirit of God that appropriates that blood and its cleansing when the believer
is baptized with the Spirit.
The
baptism of the Spirit also brings inclusion into the body of Christ. Luke
records the coming of the Spirit on the Samaritans and later, the Gentiles in part to show that these non-Jews
too were now part of the people of God because they had been baptized in the Holy Spirit. “13 For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body— Jews or Greeks, slaves or free—and
all were made to drink of one Spirit.” The
presence of the Spirit is the decisive indicator that you belong to Christ and Christ’s church. The age of the Holy Spirit, which
began at Pentecost signified that salvation is not found in the Old Covenant—it is found by faith in Christ through
the New Covenant of the Spirit.
Paul
tells these Ephesian men that believer’s water baptism is not the same as John’s baptism and its only after they are baptized by the Spirit that
he physically baptizes them in the name of Jesus. One
reason they are baptized in the name of Jesus is to outwardly signify that they now belong to Christ. Spiritually
they are IN Christ, so they are physically baptized in the name of Jesus. Water
baptism outwardly signifies what has happened to you spiritually--that you have been washed of your sins by the
blood of the Lamb as that washing is applied or mediated by the Spirit of God. In
Acts, water baptism almost always immediately follows Spirit baptism. There
was no need to delay baptism because—in most cases, the person’s baptism by the Holy Spirit was outwardly seen
through speaking in tongues, prophesying or other outward signs. It
was appropriate to baptize the person as a believer because the giving of the Spirit to them was plain to see. The chance of a false convert during
the period Luke records in Acts was far less than it is today where conversion is not typically accompanied by
any outward manifestation like tongues. We
must use other, less overt measures to determine if a person is converted.
Early
in the second century, the church made a conscious decision to wait to see if a professed convert really was a
believer, in part because the outward signs of receiving the Spirit in Acts had disappeared. That meant you couldn’t know as certainly
as in Acts if the new convert had trusted in Christ with saving faith. Probably
because they didn’t want to signify outwardly something that had not occurred inwardly (which is what baptism does),
they waited and looked for evidence of a changed life. I
wish we could immediately baptize in water everyone who claims to have trusted Christ, but because we also don’t
want water baptism to signify something that is not an inward reality, we typically wait for a while after conversion
to see if the person’s life bears fruit indicating their authenticity. That
gives us a better chance of baptizing with water someone who has also been baptized by the Spirit.
A
second truth this text teaches what we have seen before and is: The gospel will without fail spread to every people group under God’s sovereign hand. Again, all of these texts detailing
Paul’s missionary journey are intended by Luke to show that the gospel was extending to all the nations just as
Jesus had commanded. Here
are two ways the gospel goes forward then and now. The
first way is by gospel preaching that appeals first to the mind. When
you look at apostolic ministry in Acts—Paul’s or Peter’s--the first appeal in preaching is to the mind—you have
to KNOW something—thought and reflection are required. In
verse eight, Luke says this about Paul’s ministry. “And
he entered the synagogue and for three months spoke boldly, reasoning and persuading them about the kingdom of God.” We
see these same words used in connection to his ministry to the Thessalonians and the Corinthians.
John
Stott expresses the importance of this kind of preaching so well. He
writes, “This vocabulary shows that Paul’s presentation of the gospel was serious, well-reasoned
and persuasive. Because he believed the gospel to be true, he was not afraid to engage the minds of his
hearers. He did not simply proclaim his message in a ‘take it or leave it’ fashion; instead, he
marshaled arguments to support and demonstrate his case. He was seeking to convince and convert, and in fact, as Luke makes plain many were persuaded.” He
continues, “…Arguments of course are no substitute for the work of the Holy Spirit.
But
then trust in the Holy Spirit is no substitute for arguments either. We must never set them over against each other as alternatives. No, the Holy Spirit is the Spirit of truth, and he brings people to faith in Jesus not
in spite of the evidence, but because of the evidence, when he opens their minds to attend to it.”[2]
The
gospel spread as Paul preached to the intellects of his hearers. You
must get truth into the mind before it can then be manifest in the person’s the affections—things like conviction
or joy or enthusiasm to obey, and finally a willful decisions to follow Christ. Mind,
then affections, then the will—thinking, feeling, obeying. That
is the order in which God works in people. A
second way in which the gospel spread is through opposition that God uses to further advance the gospel. In
Acts, as well as through much of church history, God has used opposition to the gospel powerfully to help spread
the gospel.
In Acts chapter
eight, persecution drove the church out from Jerusalem and in so doing served God’s purpose to extend its reach
to the Samaritans. In
this text, when people in the synagogue “became stubborn and continued in unbelief, speaking evil of the Way before the congregation,
he withdrew from them and took the disciples with him reasoning daily in the hall of Tyrannus.” Paul
is forced to flee the synagogue and decides to set up shop in a lecture hall--a secular place where people of many
different beliefs came. This
would have been a bit like preaching in a lecture hall at UMD.
Luke
records that this ministry “continued
for two years, so that all the residents of Asia heard the word of the Lord, both Jews and Greeks.” God’s
strategy worked.
Ephesus, as the
hub of Asia where everyone would eventually travel for some reason, was where all the residents of Asia heard the gospel. Do
you suppose the Greeks and all the residents of Asia would have heard the gospel if he had stayed in the Jewish
synagogue? Of course not. Only
Jews and God-fearing gentiles went to the synagogue and those two groups together comprised only a small percentage
of the population of Asia. So,
God uses opposition to the gospel to drive Paul to preach in a place where it will be heard by a much larger audience. As we give the gospel out—(even this
Wednesday when many are going to the Lake to share the gospel) don’t let possible opposition discourage you. God uses it all the time for the conversion
of sinners.
As
we close, here are two points of application. First,
doctrine
and knowing doctrine can be, and often is, the difference between heaven and hell. This
has been a doctrinal sermon because this text is chocked full of doctrine—If you are going to do faithful to this
text, doctrine must be a huge piece. We
must know that ultimately Paul’s concern about these men of Ephesus was not only about their spiritual experience,
but more fundamentally, sound doctrine. When
Paul asks them, “Did
you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” The implication is a doctrinal claim. That
is—receiving
the Holy Spirit is essential to be saved. When
he asked them about their baptism, another doctrinal truth lies behind it. That
is—water
baptism in Jesus’ name reflects the baptism by the Holy Spirit. That’s
a doctrine.
When Paul understood
what had happened with these men, he explained the doctrine of John the Baptist’s ministry. Verse four, “John baptized with the baptism of
repentance, telling the people to believe in the one who as to come after him, that is, Jesus.” He
is teaching doctrine here. Specifically, the relationship between John and his baptism and message and Jesus and
his baptism with the Spirit to all who believe. That
is a doctrinal distinction.
In
evangelicalism today, doctrine is so often frowned upon or at least marginalized and that is the result of a deadly
deception Satan has perpetrated on the church. John
Piper speaks of Athanasius who in the third century argued against those who claimed that Jesus was not God. He argued against a heretic named
Arius who taught much the same doctrine about Christ as espoused today by cults like the Jehovah’s witnesses and
the Mormons that deny his deity. Piper
writes this as it applies to today’s church, “What was clear to Athanasius was that propositions about Christ carried convictions that
could send you to heaven or to hell. There were propositions like: “There was a time when the Son of God was not,”
and, “He was not before he was made,” and, “the Son of God is created.” These propositions were strictly damnable.
If they were spread and believed they would damn the souls which embraced them…”
“I believe Athanasius would have abominated, with tears, the contemporary call for “depropositionalizing”
that you hear among many… I think he would have said, “Our young people in Alexandria die for the truth of propositions
about Christ. What do your young people die for?” And if the answer came back, “We die for Christ, not propositions
about Christ,” I think he would have said, “That’s what Arius says. So which Christ will you die for?”
Athanasius
would have grieved over sentences like “It is Christ who unites us; it is doctrine that divides.” And sentences
like: “We should ask, Whom do you trust? rather than what do you believe?” He would have grieved because he knew this is the very tactic used by the Arian bishops
to cover the councils with fog so that the word “Christ” could mean anything…” Learning,
believing and articulating sound doctrine mattered then and it matters just as much now.
A second and final point of application is one we have mentioned before, but Luke’s multiple repetitions of it tell us that we must also repeat it—it’s that important. That is: repentance is necessary for salvation. Those within the church who claim repentance is not part of the call of the gospel because it is a “work” simply do not understand repentance, the gospel—or frankly, much of the message of Scripture very well. In Second Timothy 2:25 tells us that the man of God must, “25 correct… his opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth,” Repentance is granted by God—it’s not a work. Beyond that, Paul explains his gospel ministry in Romans1:5. “…we have received grace and apostleship to bring about the obedience of faith for the sake of his name among all the nations.” Saving faith brings about obedience to God and that means repentance from dead works. Hebrews 6:1 says, “1 Therefore let us leave the elementary doctrine of Christ and go on to maturity, not laying again a foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God,” Repentance from dead works is elementary—it’s foundational—it’s part of the gospel. May God give all of us the grace know the truth so we can obey the truth.
Home - 1st Corinthians - Romans - Reformed Theology - Judges - Assurance - Prayer - Moses - Stewardship - Missions - Daniel - Galatians Gospels - Worship - Acts |
Page last modified on 7/17//2011
(c) 2010 - 2011 All material is property of Duncan Ross and/or Mount of Olives Baptist Church, all commercial rights are reserved. Please feel free to use any of this material in your ministry.