
MESSAGE FOR NOVEMBER 23, 2003
FROM 1 CORINTHIANS 2-3
This morning, we move into a second week in
a series on true and false conversion and assurance. Last week we introduced the topic by pointing to just how
practical it is to us.
It is crucial to our spiritual health to know
the state of our souls and Paul tells us in 2 Corinthians 13:5 that we are to “examine
ourselves to see whether we are in the faith.” We
are called by Peter in 2 Peter 1:10 to “make
our calling and election sure” as we live
out lives marked by Christ-like character.
We also said there is very little treatment
on this topic today by good scholars or in church teaching ministries.
This vacuum of solid teaching has been filled
with superficial or just plain errant understandings of what it is to be a Christian and what is a solid ground
of assurance of salvation.
We said there is often little awareness among
evangelicals of the strong biblical evidence that teaches our strong
tendency toward self-deception about the state of our souls.
Jeremiah says in 17:9, “The heart is deceitful
above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it?” Although
that text and numerous others like it should not be the ONLY truth that influences us on this issue, it should
play a significant role in how we go about discovering the truth about our soul.
We saw another important truth that is often
ignored because of this vacuum relates to the
nature of God and his relationship to sinners. Too
often in evangelicalism God is portrayed as a Being who exists solely for the purpose of saving sinners rather
than for his own glory.
This gross imbalance has tragically in the
mind of scores of people made the salvation of a lost sinner ultimately dependent upon the decision of the sinner,
rather than through the saving power of God through a miraculous work of regeneration.
This ignorance about God and his relationship to sinners
has left little if any place for us to be informed on this issue by texts like Matthew 7:13-14 where Jesus says,
“Enter by the narrow gate. For
the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For
the gate is narrow and the way is hard
that leads to life, and those who find
it are few.”
For many that text and others like it play
no practical role in informing us in the area of conversion and assurance.
Finally, we noted there is a significant void
in the area of understanding the radical
nature of the Christian life.
We looked at several texts which point to
the fact that the bible teaches a radical, otherworldly kind of life that simply cannot find its origin simply
in a human decision to pray a prayer.
That’s where we have been—please feel free
to get a manuscript from last week for a fuller treatment on those issues.
This week, we will be looking at another issue
over which there has been much confusion in the church.
We could phrase it in the form of a question
this way: How are we to understand people who claim to be Christians
but whom, like ourselves at times think and live more like unredeemed sinners than saints? In
light of our tendency to be self-deceived and over confident as it relates to our souls—in light of our ignorance-based
tendency to oversimplify what is involved in becoming a Christian and in light of the radical nature of the Christian
life as it is portrayed biblically, how are we to understand those times when we or other supposedly born again
Christians we witness are not thinking or living much like Christ?
Are we to immediately conclude that we are
not believers?
How do we understand the sometimes-gross inconsistencies
between what the bible says about how we are to think and live and our many failures?
Those are very important questions and some
important answers are found in Paul’s letter to the Corinthians chapters two and three.
Please turn there.
To give us a context for these verses, we
must first know that this is a young church to which Paul is writing.
Acts 18 tells us Paul ministered for 18 months
as he planted this church at Corinth.
The writing of the letter we call First Corinthians
was written within three years of the time he left Corinth. As far as I can tell there was no other apostolic ministry
to this church during this crucial developmental time for this church.
Further, Corinth was a very easy place to
get off track spiritually due to the rampant immorality of the Corinthian culture surrounding the church. You
get the picture—these were very much Christians in the nursery of the faith and their nursery was surrounded by
the moral filth of a debased, arrogant Roman culture, which had significantly corrupted them.
We
also know from several texts that the Corinthians were, in spite of their spiritual immaturity, ironically very
sure of themselves spiritually.
They had a very well defined idea about what
it was to be “spiritual” and in their self-deceived minds they were well advanced in this pursuit. We
also see from many places in this letter that as a group they were also very skeptical about whether the apostle
Paul was a very spiritual person.
This kind of anti-Paul sentiment had bred
divisions in the body over several issues including the apostle’s ministry.
As a church they had turned on their spiritual
“father” in the faith and Paul suffered from a significant credibility gap where the Corinthians were concerned. This
brought significant division in the church over whether they would follow him or another teacher like Apollos. Paul
confronts this church for this division in chapter three but he sets the stage for this severe rebuke in chapter
two beginning in verse 14.
Paul writes, “The
natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to
understand them because they are spiritually discerned.
15The spiritual person judges all things, but is himself
to be judged by no one.
16"For who has understood the mind of the Lord so as
to instruct him?" But we have the mind of Christ. 3:1But I, brothers,
could not address you as spiritual people, but as people of the flesh, as infants in Christ.
2I fed you with milk, not solid food, for you were not ready
for it. And even now you are not yet ready,
3for you are still of the flesh. For while there is jealousy
and strife among you, are you not of the flesh and behaving only in a human way?
4For when one says, "I follow Paul," and another,
"I follow Apollos," are you not being merely human?
I want to point to two complimentary truths in this text
and one more in the climax of Paul’s argument, which we’ll read later.
The first truth is found in verses 14-16 and
is: There are two broad classes of people as it relates to
their spiritual state. One
of the widely held myths in the church today coming from several sources is Paul in this text teaches there are
three spiritual classes of people—unsaved, saved, and saved but carnal.
That is, there are people who can perhaps
perpetually live like the world but who are still in the kingdom of God.
That three fold classification of people is
not found in the bible and it is not found in this text.
Those who view this text this way have badly
missed Paul’s point in verses 14-16 and have thoroughly misunderstood what the apostle is saying.
Verses 14-16 teach that there are for Paul
only two classes
of people as it relates to their spiritual condition.
Verse 14 discusses the “natural
person” or more literally the “soulish person.”
In verses 15-16 he contrasts the natural person
with the “spiritual person” or the person with the Holy Spirit.
It’s clear from what Paul says the “natural person” is
not saved. He says in verse 14, “The
natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to
understand them because they are spiritually discerned.”
Paul is saying the natural or soulish man
does not “get” God or “the things of the
Spirit of God”—they are foolishness to
him. From the larger context, which we will look at in a moment,
it’s clear the reason why the soulish man doesn’t “get” the things of the Spirit is because he is lacking the necessary
element to do that—the Holy Spirit.
His spiritual radar is simply not equipped
with the supernatural, God element necessary to discern the things of the Spirit.
In verses 15-16 Paul says by contrast, “The spiritual person judges all things, but is himself
to be judged by no one.
For who has understood the mind of the Lord
so as to instruct him?”
But we have the mind of Christ.”
This text has been abused to say all sorts
of bizarre things about the presence of some sort of spiritually elite group of people within the church who are
more “tuned in” to God than the rest of us.
It cannot mean that because Paul’s contrast
is between the natural man and the spiritual man, not between those who are spiritually sensitive in the church
and those who aren’t.
We know about the spiritual man from verse
12 where Paul says of the church, “Now
we have received not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, that we might understand the things
freely given by God.”
It is the presence of the Spirit of God that
enables a person to be called in Paul’s vocabulary, “the
spiritual person.”
This person judges or more literally “examines”
all things, but is himself to be judged by no one.”
In
order to understand this verse we must remember Paul is contrasting the person with the Spirit and the soulish
man without the Spirit.
When Paul says, “The
spiritual person judges [or, more literally]
examines all things, but is himself to
be judged/examined by no one” he is probably
saying that someone with the Spirit is able to examine or discern things whether he be inside or outside the kingdom
of God but those outside the kingdom are not able to accurately discern what is going on in him. Holy Spirit-indwelt
believer is not limited to discerning or examining only those things that are sacred.
We are able to discern “all things” whether
they are of the darkness or light because the A Holy Spirit gives us the mind of Christ to judge both. What’s
more, we are able to discern the natural, unsaved person because before our conversion we were one of them and
even as redeemed, regenerated people, we still have a fallen, sinful component Paul regularly calls “the flesh”
as part of our spiritual makeup.
The natural person, by contrast cannot discern
the things of the Spirit because he doesn’t HAVE the Spirit and therefore cannot discern the things of the Spirit.
In his sinful pride, the natural/unsaved person assumes that what he doesn’t understand must be foolishness.
The main point is that for Paul you
are either in the kingdom or out of it—you are either natural or spiritual. The
next verses must be seen against this “dual classification” backdrop of verses 14-16 if we are to rightly understand
what comes next and understand Paul’s very powerful point.
The next truth comes from 3:1-4 and is simply
this: It is possible to be genuinely born again and live for
a season more like the world in certain areas than like Christ. There
are two points to prove in order to establish this as Paul’s meaning here.
First, that Paul
assumes he is writing to genuine believers
and second, that their
behavior was worldly. We know Paul assumes
he is writing to believers from several lines of evidence.
One is from 2:12 we already quoted where he
says, “Now we have received not the spirit
of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, that we might understand the things freely given by God.” Paul
assumes the Corinthians have the Holy Spirit because there is no reason from the text to think that Paul is not
including the Corinthians in his use of the pronoun “we.”
Second, in 3:1 he refers to them, as he does
about 30 other times in this letter, as “brothers.”
Obviously, within that designation he includes
“sisters” too and we know from every other usage of this word in this letter that he equates “brothers” with believers.
Finally,
at the end of 3:1 Paul says that he was forced, due to their spiritual immaturity to address them as “infants in Christ.” For
Paul to refer to the Corinthians as being in
Christ means he is assuming they are saved
and he says that though he could not address them as “spiritual
people” as he should have been able to,
he does refer to them as being “in Christ” albeit in an infantile stage of their development. You
can imagine how these proud Corinthians who considered themselves to be very spiritual felt when Paul told them
he could not even address them as “spiritual
people” and in fact that he was forced
to address them as spiritual babes.
We must not miss Paul’s biting irony here.
Second,
Paul accuses these Corinthian brethren of acting more like the world than believers.
He repeatedly makes this point in the first
four verses of chapter three. Please notice this.
“But I, brothers, could not address you
as spiritual people, but as people of the
flesh, as infants in Christ.
2I fed you with milk, not solid food, for
you were not ready for it. And even now you are not yet ready, 3for you are still
of the flesh.
For while there is jealousy and strife among you, are you not of
the flesh and behaving only in a human way?
4For when one says, "I follow Paul," and another,
"I follow Apollos," are you not being merely
human? Even though Paul calls these people brothers and sees them
as having the Holy Spirit, here we see these are people who in at least one way act just like the world. Three
times he says they are “of the flesh.”
This is NOT the same Greek word he uses to
describe the “natural man” earlier in 2:14-16.
That word was “psuchikos” or soulish man.
This term is “sarkikoi”—fleshly or carnal people.
Paul makes a distinction between the unsaved
and the fleshly or carnal people whom he assumes have the Holy Spirit.
Paul’s point here is very precise and some
in the church have missed Paul by trying to make it broader than it is.
Many see these two facts--that on the one
hand, Paul assumes these Corinthians are saved and on the other that they are living like the world and infer from
this that Paul is creating a third class of person—a carnal Christian class.
From that unbiblical classification many have
understood that it is possible to be a believer and yet for an indefinite period live like the world and then upon
death to be ushered into heaven as a “carnal Christian.”
Those people, it is often stated have “missed God’s best for
them, but
they are surely in heaven because after all, they accepted Christ.”
Many wrongly believe that since Paul teaches
you are either natural or spiritual and since these Corinthians are carnal and he assumes they are believers, therefore
a person who has prayed to receive Christ can live in a perpetually carnal state and still go to heaven because
they claim to have
accepted Christ.
That view not only does horrible violence
to many Scriptures outside this text, some of which we quoted last week, it also completely misses Paul’s point
here. When all of this section is included, it is clear that Paul’s point in this text, which is our third point,
is this. That is:
living in a manner inconsistent with
our new birth should be seen as a gross scandal which if perpetuated will bring eternal condemnation to those who
live that way.
Paul’s point here is not to create a new,
“carnal class” of believers.
It is to in the most stark terms point out
the utter inconsistency of a church assumedly full of believers but who in many instances think and act like the
world. When you trace Paul’s argument, it is clear that the reason
he in verses 14-16 makes the distinction between a natural and a spiritual man is to show the
gross scandal it is to have a group of
people who are assumedly “spiritual people,” who presumably have the Holy Spirit in them, who assumedly have the
capacity to “examine all things” and have the mind of Christ—for THOSE people to be living
like those who are unsaved, “natural people” and for whom the things of the Spirit are foolishness
is outrageous!
He wants us to see how outrageous it is for
him to be unable to address a group of presumably spiritual people as “spiritual
people” and who because of their immaturity
cannot even receive solid food and to whom he must speak as spiritual babies.
THAT is Paul’s point. It is a scandal for
people who are spiritual—who assumedly have the Holy Spirit to be living fleshly in the same manner as the (verse
four,) “merely human.”
Paul is mortified by this abhorrent disconnect
and he wants the Corinthians to be as well.
As we look to other texts in Paul we see that
this is not only a scandal, it is also spiritually very dangerous to be living like this.
According to verse three, the Corinthians
had been guilty of “jealousy and strife” in their divisive sin.
In Galatians 5:19-21 Paul draws the ultimate
spiritual bottom line as it relates to people who live in a pattern of unrepentant sin.
He writes, “Now
the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality,
20idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife,
jealousy, [same
words Paul uses to describe the Corinthian behavior in 3:3] fits
of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions,
21envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn
you, as I warned you before, that those
who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.” If
a person has as a pattern of their life, unrepentant sin like those listed, Paul says, irrespective of their testimony,
we have absolutely no ground to hope that they will go to heaven, which is what is meant by, “inheriting
the kingdom of God.”
But we don’t have to go to Galatians to see
this truth. Later on in chapter three he makes the same point. Through
their jealousy and strife, the Corinthians were bringing division into the body of Christ—they were corrupting
God’s holy temple.
Paul has some very choice words for them in
verses 16-17.
He says, “Do
you not know that you are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in you?
If anyone destroys God’s temple, God will
destroy him. For God’s temple is holy, and you are that temple.”
Twice Paul makes the point that the Corinthians
are God’s temple but he also says that anyone who destroys God’s temple will himself will be destroyed. That
word translated “destroy” I believe speaks to ETERNAL destruction because in Ephesians 4:22 Paul uses it to describe
the fate of our old self that will be eternally destroyed and in 2 Peter 2:12 and Jude 1:10 the word refers to
the eternal judgment of the false teachers. Paul is threatening these Corinthians who, through their jealousy and
strife are destroying God’s temple with eternal destruction.
Do you feel the tension here? Paul
wants us to feel this tension.
One question at this point is, “If Paul on the one hand refers to the Corinthians as “God’s
temple” or” brothers” and on the other, he threatens them with eternal destruction, then why should we not believe
he is teaching that a true believer can lose their salvation because that would be easy to extract from these two
truths?” First, let me say that that question,
which speaks to the very real New Testament teaching on apostasy or falling away, is a huge one and we will spend
at least one message on that single question.
My answer today will be necessarily incomplete. Having
qualified that, here are two reasons why I do not believe as do some that these two truths require us to conclude
that a genuine, Holy Spirit indwelt believer can lose their salvation.
First, Paul’s
ultimate point of application to this carnal church in Corinth is not to explicitly warn them about losing their
salvation.
His ultimate and explicit point of application
in response to their carnality is found in 2 Corinthians 13:5 which says, “Examine
yourselves, to see whether you are in the faith. Test yourselves. Or do you not realize [or,
“know fully”—1 Cor. 13:12] this about yourselves,
that Jesus Christ is in you? —unless indeed you fail to meet the test!”
Paul’s bottom line question at the end of
his correspondence to these carnal people is—are you in the faith—do you fully know that Jesus Christ is in you—have
you failed the test?
He does NOT say, “Are
you STILL in the faith?” Paul’s point
of application is NOT “have
you lost your salvation?” but rather,
“Are you
saved in the first place?” A
second reason why I don’t believe we should connects the dots here to a person losing their salvation is because
Paul’s reference to the Corinthian church
at large as a “holy temple” or “brothers” are a simple assumptions he is making but are not intended by Paul to
be authoritative statements that they are genuinely saved. Think
about it. Paul is writing to a church he had planted. He
had led many of these people to faith himself.
He knows there are genuine believers there
and it would be horribly awkward for him to qualify each reference to the church at Corinth like this, “You
(plural pronoun) are God’s temple”—that is, those of you who are genuinely, assuredly saved
but not the ones who are, though professing Christ are in truth, eternally lost—YOU—the real ones--are God’s temple.” A
letter written like that would be incredibly confusing.
We see proof that these references are assumptions and
NOT Paul’s stamp of spiritual authenticity in 2 Corinthians chapter 13:11.
Now remember, he has just commanded them to
examine themselves to see if they are in the faith.
Yet six verses later he says to this crowd,
“Finally, brothers…”
Paul is not stupid.
He knows there may very well be in this church
those who don’t truly know Christ—he has implied as much in 13:5, yet when he refers to the church at large just
a few verses later, he refers to them as “brothers.”
He is making a very self-conscious, broad
assumption. That’s the text.
Now, here are two quick points of application. First,
it is
unbiblical and spiritually dangerous to believe a person can be living like the world, yet be in Christ and destined
for heaven. In Romans 1:5 Paul speaks
of the “obedience of faith.”
He means that true saving faith will issue
in obedience to God.
That means by application that if a person
has little if any obedience to Christ, then we must at some point ask if that person has saving faith in Christ. If
we or a person we know are living in prolonged, unrepentant sin, we have every reason to be very uncertain about
the state of our soul.
Second, if
we are going through a period of spiritual compromise our first response should be to find forgiveness and strength
to over come our defeat through the gospel.
We must not miss the fact that even to
this very carnal Corinthian church; Paul does not rush to judgment about their spiritual condition. He
gives them the benefit of the doubt for a long time.
First Corinthians 6:9-11 is typical of his
pastoral care of people in sin.
He says, “Do
you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God?
Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral,
nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor greedy, nor drunkards, nor
revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
And such were some of you.
But you were washed, you were sanctified,
you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of God.”
Notice the balance there.
First, he makes an objective statement about
the inconsistency of believing that those who practice heinous sin go to heaven and he warns them against deception.
That is the part that is often missing today and we must always remember that and be sobered by it. But he concludes
with a reminder of their experience of the gospel and its power to help them overcome those sins.
He doesn’t condemn—he states the truth about
the eternal ramifications of unchecked sin and then he brings the Corinthians back to the gospel. Romans teaches
us that the only sin we can have victory over is one we have received forgiveness for and we must believe the gospel
and receive the forgiveness offered through Christ.
Also, we must remember that Paul in Romans
six teaches the cross not only gives us cleansing from sin but also victory over the power of sin.
We must go against the greasy grace and unexamined lives of the prevalent evangelical culture and at times examine ourselves to see if we are in the faith and challenge others to do the same especially in times of prolonged spiritual defeat. But our first step should be to go back to the gospel and claim the forgiving, justifying and sanctifying victory Christ has purchased for us at Calvary. May God give us the grace to live in a manner consistent with God’s work in our lives and to take biblical measures when we or others fail to do that.
CLICK HERE FOR THE NEXT SERMON PAGE.
Page last modified on 11/30/2003
(c) 2003 - All material is property of Duncan Ross and/or Mount of Olives Baptist Church, all commercial rights are reserved. Please feel free to use any of this material in your minstry.