
SERMON
FOR MARCH 8, 1998 FROM ROMANS 1:18ff.
As we move to chapter one, verse 18 in the
book of Romans, we begin a new section of the letter.
This section of the letter--verses 18-32 have
become very important to the church today.
There are several theological truths in this
text, but there are two major truths which are probably most often cited today.
First, these verses clearly teach that God
has unmistakably revealed Himself to all people through his creation.
That’s important for a number of reasons in
the fields of apologetics and
missiology.
Second, this text addresses the issue of God’s
view of homosexual behavior. Those are very important issues and every Christian should know what this text says
about those things and we will address those issues.
But as important as those issues are, they
are not Paul’s main emphasis here. Frankly, given the emotional power those two issues elicit from this text, it
is easy to miss what Paul says is the main issue here. The main theme of this text
found in verse 18 can be easily missed unless we read it in context with the text we studied last week.
Read along with me as I read these verses. To
help us see the connection between these verses in Paul’s thinking, I am going to include a connective word between
verses 17 and 18 that is in the Greek but the NIV leaves out.
Beginning in verse 16 Paul writes, I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power
of God for the salvation of everyone who believes:
first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. For
in the gospel a righteousness of God is revealed, a righteousness that is by faith from first to last, just as
it is written: The righteous will live by faith.
For the wrath of God is being revealed from
heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness.” When
you hear verse 18 in its context, it is clear the one idea Paul is stressing in this next section is the wrath
of God. This morning I will make three points about the wrath of
God. First, the doctrine of the wrath of God is central to Paul’s
understanding of the Gospel.
Second, the doctrine of the wrath of God as
it is commonly presented today is biblically imbalanced.
Third, the abuse of the doctrine of the wrath
of God has had a strongly negative effect on the church.
First, lets see the
centrality of this doctrine as it plays into Paul’s understanding of the gospel.
Paul says in verse 17 that the gospel reveals
a righteousness from God that is by faith.
The gospel, when supernaturally applied to
a person’s life brings to that person a righteousness that is from God by faith.
A legitimate question is, “Why is it necessary for a
person to have this righteousness of God?” In
verse 18 Paul gives the answer.
The reason people need the righteousness of God is because without it, they are under the wrath
of God. The stark and sobering truth of Scripture is, apart from
the mercy
of God given through the gospel, humanity
is continually subject to
the holy anger
of God--his wrath.
As Paul writes Romans, he is laying out the
manifold glory and wonder of the gospel.
But before he can detail the wonders of justification
by faith given by a merciful and compassionate God, he must first by logical necessity detail our need for justification
which is the horrific consequences of sin before a holy and angry God.
All of chapter 1:18-32 (in some ways it could
be said the first three chapters of Romans) is about the wrath of God.
This entire text answers two broad questions
and both are related to the wrath of God.
The first question is:
what prompts
His wrath--what evokes it?
The second question is:
how does
God reveal his wrath toward a sinner in this life?
We will look at those questions in the weeks
to come. This morning I want to speak on this issue of the wrath
of God in general.
The reason for this is simple. One
assumption upon which the gospel rests is, those without the gospel will taste the fierce anger of a holy God. We
will never appreciate the mercy of God in the gospel which is laid out in Romans unless we first come to terms
with the anger of God in His wrath.
The problem in discussing this issue is, the
subject of the wrath of God has fallen on hard times in the church.
The topic is not one many people spend much
time studying. We have in many ways “outgrown” it, I suppose. It
is passé, arcane, irrelevant.
There are reams of books written each year
devoted to the mercy and grace and loving kindness of God-his forgiveness, his patience, his healing. Yet,
very few books are written on God’s wrath and none make it to the best seller list.
Another indicator that the climate is hostile
to this topic is seen in the fact that the doctrine which contains the ultimate expression of God’s wrath, the
doctrine of hell is today under
attack from people who call themselves conservative
evangelicals. More and more so called evangelicals are rejecting the idea
of the eternal, endless torment of the wicked in favor of a more “enlightened” position which holds that the torment
isn’t forever, it ends with the destruction of the person. This trend unbiblical!
Our second point is: the doctrine of the wrath
of God as it is commonly
presented today
is biblically unbalanced.
The unfavorable atmosphere to the doctrine
of the wrath of God is utterly impossible to support biblically.
It is thoroughly inconsistent with Scripture. Case
in point: the most prevalent theme of Jesus’ teaching ministry is
judgment and hell.
Thirteen percent of all his teaching is on
those two subjects.
Those subjects are EXCLUSIVELY concerned with
the wrath of God.
Over half of Jesus’ 40 parables relate to God’s
eternal judgment of sinners and in the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus mentions hell three times. If a preacher in virtually
any church today were to spend 13% of his sermons and devote half of his stories to the theme of God’s wrath, he
would be dismissed as theologically imbalanced and a theatrical “hell
fire and brimstone” preacher. The
wrath of God may be passé to the church, but it isn’t passé to Jesus and He hasn’t changed since
His time on earth. We typically think the subject of God’s wrath is almost exclusively an Old Testament doctrine,
but the teaching of Jesus shows that is simply not the case.
No prophet, Old or New Testament speaks as
graphically or as often about the ultimate expression of the wrath of God as does Jesus Christ.
The church in America has not always been silent
on this issue. To show you how far we have drifted, let me read to you
a brief excerpt from a sermon preached on this subject some time ago.
Listen to these words preached in a church
but addressed to the unredeemed sinners in the church,
“That
God holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider, or some loathsome insect over the fire, abhors
you, and is dreadfully provoked; this wrath toward you burns like fire; he looks upon you as worthy of nothing
else, but to be cast into the fire; he is of purer eyes than to bear to have you in his sight; you are ten thousand
times more abominable in his eyes, than the most hateful venomous serpent is in ours.
You have offended
him infinitely more than ever a stubborn rebel did his prince and yet it is nothing but his hand that holds you
from falling into the fire every moment...O sinner! Consider the fearful danger you are in:
it is a great
furnace of wrath, a wide and bottomless pit, full of the fire of wrath, that you are held over in the hand of that
God, whose wrath is provoked and incensed as much against you, as against many of the damned in hell.
You hang by
a slender thread, with the flames of divine wrath flashing about it, and ready every moment to singe it, and burn
it asunder.”
That sermon was given not by some uneducated,
fear mongering, emotionally manipulative, money grubbing, self serving itinerant as many would suppose. That
sermon was given by the first President of what we now call Princeton University.
It was given by the man who, more than any
other single person, is acknowledged to be not only the finest theologian ever produced by America, but also the
greatest intellect ever produced by America.
I speak of Jonathan Edwards.
Some have assailed Edwards for his alleged
over statement in his treatment of the anger of God toward sinners.
Edwards himself said,
“After
we have said our utmost and thought our utmost [about God’s wrath], all that we have really said or thought is
but a faint shadow of what really is.”
My own judgment when I look at the Biblical
record--the Old and New Testament is that if Edwards, in his strong emphasis on this topic was imbalanced, he was
not nearly so imbalanced as the church in her silence on this topic is today.
The times and culture have changed since 1741
when that sermon was originally preached, but the biblical data on this topic has not changed one jot or tittle. The
fact that we find ourselves repulsed by this area of truth is understandable.
If you aren’t on some emotional level repulsed
by this topic there is something wrong with you.
But the fact that this topic is not pleasant
can in no way justify our avoiding it.
The church is thoroughly imbalanced today and
the results are all too evident.
That leads us to our third point which is: The
abuse of the doctrine of the wrath of God has had a strongly negative effect on the church.
Let me give you four negative effects
this lack of emphasis on the wrath of God has had on the church.
Last week, we saw that one of the reasons why
we do not aggressively share the gospel with those who need it is because we are embarrassed.
I think it is beyond dispute that another reason
we do not share it as aggressively as we should is we lack a sense of urgency.
The first negative effect this downplaying
of the wrath of God has had is: we
lack a sense of urgency for the lost. Although
we may give mental assent to the fact that God punishes sinners, we do not have that truth as a set conviction
of our heart. That truth doesn’t burn within us as it should. If
we really in our hearts were deeply convicted of the fact that God in His holy anger is right now at this moment
revealing his wrath against sin and sinners and will consummate that wrath by pouring out his eternal anger in
hell, then our urgency to share the gospel would be increased.
To put it another way, how can a person have
a burden for the salvation of another unless they are well acquainted with what people are saved from? Acclaimed
New testament scholar Leon Morris says rightly, “Salvation
for Paul is essentially a salvation FROM as well as a salvation unto.” A
god who has been declawed and defanged of his wrath, is a god who will, in all likelihood find it in his big heart
to somehow pardon our family and friends who aren’t true believers.
That must be the unspoken assumption of many
believers who, though claiming to love their unbelieving family and friends, do little if any praying for, or witnessing
to them. The only other possible explanation for a lack of urgency
on their behalf is that they
really don’t care whether the person suffers
the present and future wrath of God.
Do we see sinners through the biblical lens
of God’s wrath?
Do we understand how God views them? Let
me give you just one biblical metaphor to help us see whether we view sinners through the lens of God’s wrath. In
Revelation 19:15 Jesus is pictured on his return as the One who “treads
the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty.”
Revelation 14:20 completes the metaphor. It
says, “...and blood flowed out of the [wine]press...”
Christ is pictured as the One who stands in
the middle of a vat of ripe grapes and it is his weight, as he stands and walks on the press which causes the grapes
to ooze out their juices...their blood!
How does that text represent the sinner? As
the ripe grape under the heel of Christ!!
The sinners who we meet and talk with every
day are pictured in Scripture--Old and New Testament (this is a quotation from Isaiah) as fruit which is ripening
for the fire of hell.
Every day they live apart from Christ, they
grow more and more ripe and when they are fully ripened, Christ harvests them and tramples them in his wrath. That
is one way in which God views sinners--is that the way we view them--as ripening for the fires of hell? How
can we have a biblical burden for the lost if we do not see them from a biblical perspective?
A husband and a wife who don’t know Jesus Christ
bring a child into the world--a person who will live somewhere forever.
They beam with pride about his accomplishments--they
brag to their relatives about his talents and gifts.
But if that person remains unsaved--without
the benefit of the gospel, from an eternal perspective, those parents have done little more than provide, in the
person of their child, fuel for the fire of hell.
The child they are so proud of and who they
so lovingly bring into this world will spend the overwhelming majority of his existence in torment under the wrath
of God. Do we see people from a biblical, eternal perspective? We
lack a sense of urgency for the lost.
A second negative effect of this imbalance
with respect to God’s wrath is the cheap
grace we see so prevalently in the
church today. If sin doesn’t make God angry, that leaves the door wide
open for so called Christians who don’t act like Chris--who intellectually assent to the facts of the gospel, but
who view comprehensive obedience to God as more or less optional.
A crucial part of faith for any true believer
is having a healthy, biblical fear of God.
Jeremiah, looking ahead at one of the blessings
of the New covenant in Christ says in Jeremiah 32:40, “...I
will inspire them to fear me, so that they will never turn away from me.” Do
you hear the relationship between fearing God and not sinning against God?
There is a direct correlation between the two. Having
a God placed, biblical sense of God’s wrath is indispensable God in helping us to fear God which, according to
Jeremiah helps us stay obedient to God.
Without a deep sense of the God who angers,
cheap grace rushes in and before you know it, you have a mess of so called Christians who don’t act a thing like
Christ.
A third negative effect caused by this lack
of emphasis on the wrath of God is seen in
the way we present the gospel to others
when we do present it.
The gospel is often seen fundamentally as that
which God has provided to help people live more fulfilling lives, a way to put more spring into their step, the
means by which they can be free of troubling habits and addictions.
All those things are well and good and are
indeed wonderful blessings of the gospel.
But let us never forget that the fundamental
blessing of the gospel on a human level is it delivers a sinner from the wrath of a holy God.
The most daunting problem faced by the sinner
today is not that he is unfulfilled or is not happy or is bound by an addition. Their biggest problem by far is
that, to use the words of John 3:36, “the
wrath of God rests on [them].”
Is that the way we preach the gospel? Is
the gospel primarily God’s chosen method of making unhappy people, happy or is it His gracious response to sin
which He must punish with his holy wrath?
Absent a strong awareness of the wrath of God,
the gospel is reduced to little more than another in a long line of self improvement methodologies--a spiritual
cup of warm milk for the troubled soul.
Also, if we carried this deep conviction of
the truth of God’s holy anger at sin, the glory of His mercy shown in the gospel would take on added radiance and
luster. A fourth negative effect of this imbalance we’ve already
touched on is a
lack of deep appreciation for God’s grace and mercy. If
you have a lukewarm, superficial, attitude about the wrath of God, you will have, without fail--in spite of your
protests to the contrary, a lukewarm, superficial appreciation of God’s mercy in the gospel.
This we see all too clearly today. When
was the last time you wept and were broken over thoughts of God’s goodness and mercy to you in sparing you from
the wrath you so desperately deserve?
How can we appreciate our salvation, how
can we have a biblical burden to share the gospel--how can we appreciate the mercy and grace of God in the gospel,
how can we grasp the significance of Paul’s letter to the Romans unless we are first more fully convicted with
one of his underlying convictions?
Jesus said it this way in Luke 7:47, “...he who has been forgiven little loves little.” The converse of that must also be true-- “he who has been forgiven
much, loves much.”
We could put it another way, “He who understands what He
has been delivered from shows more gratitude to His deliverer.” The
classic example of this is Luther.
Luther, before his conversion was laboring
to please a holy God by trying to perfectly fulfill His law.
He was in torment as He felt God’s angry glare
passing over all his efforts to please God under the law.
When asked about his love for God he said,
“Love God,
sometimes I hate God.”
He felt the justly deserved condemnation--the pulverizing
weight of the wrath of a holy God.
But then Luther discovered the gospel--the
wonderful truth that “a righteousness from
God is revealed.”
The crushing weight was lifted--this burden
which he had labored under so intensely, in a moment in time was transferred to Christ--He was free and in His
liberty, God used him and the other reformers to change the course of history.
This teaching is central to Paul’s theology
in Romans. It is no accident that the first major doctrinal section
on this marvelous treatise on the gospel deals with the wrath of God.
The closer we are to having the same understanding
of the wrath of God as Paul the closer we will be to grasping the depth not only of chapter one, but of the entire
book of Romans.
The church, perhaps for fear of sounding irrelevant
has largely ignored this doctrine.
We dare not do so.
Let others write this teaching off as irrelevant
and passé.
May we, by God’s grace have a firm and experiential
conviction of this truth so the abuses caused by ignoring this truth may be corrected and Christ be exalted.
CLICK HERE FOR NEXT SERMON IN THIS SERIES
Page last modified on 12/31/2001
(c) 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 - All material is property of Duncan Ross and/or Mount of Olives Baptist Church, all commercial rights are reserved. Please feel free to use any of this material in your minstry.